Archive for January, 2014

Benefits of Online Nursing Degree Programs

If you are interested in entering the health-care industry, nursing is one profession to consider. With the growing demand for nurses in medical institutions, corporate and private agencies, you will find a varied number of job opportunities available to you. Work hours are normally flexible and Nurses receive high salaries, excellent work benefits, and are generally assured of job security.

Nowadays, you can receive training in nursing through online degree programs. The online courses are considered on par with degrees from regular nursing schools and are accepted by most employers. Check out the different nursing degree programs that are available online.

There are various benefits in going for online nursing degree programs:

Study at your own convenience:

With online degree programs, you save the time and money spent in commuting and can study from the comfort of your own home and complete the course at your own pace. You can choose from a variety of different online nursing degree programs and take your time to finish the course or accelerate through the work and get your degree earlier.

Since online nursing degree programs require a good deal of self-discipline and motivation to complete, they foster critical thinking and independent decision making skills. These abilities are valued by employers as it is very necessary for nurses to be competent and confident on the job.

Get acquainted with the latest technologies:

Online degree programs are conducted entirely over the Internet and usually make use of the latest digital technologies. This will give you a hands-on experience in the use of new software and applications. You will find this of immense help in your later career as most hospitals and medical centers have gone digital and now use computer technology on a very wide scale – from keeping digital medical records to monitoring patients to running life support systems and much more.

Improve your communication and cross-cultural skills:

Nurses with multilingual abilities and experience in dealing with different people of different cultures are especially in demand in the health-care industry. Here online nursing degree programs can help you a great deal as students participating in online degree programs come from all over the world and from varied social background. Regular interactions with your fellow students from abroad will probably give you a pretty good insight on their social, cultural, political, and economic issues. This will come to good use in communicating well with medical colleagues, doctors, hospital administrators, and patients later on, all of whom are sure to come from wide strata of society.

Namita Awasthi

44 comments - What do you think?
Posted by mark - January 30, 2014 at 12:29 pm

Categories: Critical Thinking   Tags: , , , , , , , , , , , , ,

The art of brainwashing a Republican Ideal?

It it safe to say that most republican supporters are brainwashed? They seem to focus on nonsense and lies about Obama as their sole reason for voting for McCain. Nothing substantial is ever mentioned about Obamas’ policies.

Both sides have their brainwashed supporters. But I agree, the right more so than the left. It is my experience that liberals have a more expansive, sophisticated and open worldview than that of the Hannity-ites on the right, whom are more disposed to patriotic chauvinism, NASCAR, Christian fundamentalism, and xenophobia.

19 comments - What do you think?
Posted by mark - January 29, 2014 at 11:59 am

Categories: Conservative Ideals   Tags:

A Conservative’s Critique of U.S. Foreign Policy Under Bush

Complete video at:

Harvard University historian Niall Ferguson offers a conservative’s critique of U.S. foreign policy under the Bush Administration.


Niall Ferguson discusses “After the Bush Doctrine: What Next for American Foreign Policy?” This event was part of the Hoover Institution’s Fall Retreat 2007.

Niall Ferguson, MA, D.Phil., is the Laurence A. Tisch Professor of History at Harvard University. He is a resident faculty member of the Minda de Gunzburg Center for European Studies. He is also a Senior Research Fellow of Jesus College, Oxford University, and a Senior Fellow of the Hoover Institution, Stanford University.

He is a regular contributor to television and radio on both sides of the Atlantic. In 2003 he wrote and presented a six-part history of the British Empire for Channel 4, the UK terrestrial broadcaster. The accompanying book, Empire: The Rise and Demise of the British World Order and the Lessons for Global Power (Basic), was a bestseller in both Britain and the United States. The sequel, Colossus: The Rise and Fall of the American Empire, was published in 2004 by Penguin. His latest book is The War of the World, a global history of the Second World War, which was published to critical acclaim in September 2006. He is currently completing a biography of Siegmund Warburg and has recently begun researching a life of Henry Kissinger.

A prolific commentator on contemporary politics and economics, Niall Ferguson writes and reviews regularly for the British and American press. He is a contributing editor for the Financial Times. In 2004 Time magazine named him as one of the world’s hundred most influential people.

Duration : 0:10:16

Read more…

49 comments - What do you think?
Posted by mark - January 28, 2014 at 11:46 am

Categories: Conservative Studies   Tags: , , , , , , , , , , , , , ,


David Zucker’s Iraq Study Group ad.

Duration : 0:2:23

Read more…

25 comments - What do you think?
Posted by mark - January 24, 2014 at 10:38 am

Categories: Conservative Studies   Tags: , , , , , , , , , , ,

Spectrum Of Loan Programs

If you were to rate every possible loan program on a scale from the most conservative to the least conservative, you’d have the 30-year and 40-year fixed amortizing loans on the conservative end and the negative amortization variable-rate loans on the opposite side. Those are the two extremes.

On the conservative end, you’re paying off the loan at a fixed interest rate. Nothing changes. Your payment is exactly the same each and every month, for 30 or 40 years. That means you make the exact same payment today as you will in the year 2036, or even 2046.

On the aggressive end, you’ve got a loan where your payment isn’t even enough to pay the interest on the loan! So the size of the loan is actually getting bigger each month. To make matters worse, the underlying interest rate is variable. That means you can’t even plan the extent to which your loan balance is expected to grow.

We’ll take a look at the whole spectrum but first, we need to examine the interest rate structure. The 30-year fixed mortgage is one of the most conservative options available. It has the least amount of risk. Well, for the bank, the opposite is true. By reducing risk for the borrower, all the market risk is transferred to the bank. If interest rates sky-rocket, the bank cannot change the rate on your mortgage. It’s fixed. They also can’t “call” the loan because you’ve got a full 30 years to pay it off. So the bank could be making more money but they’re stuck with you and your low fixed-rate mortgage.

That’s a risk the bank takes when it gives you a fixed-rate mortgage. And as a result, the bank charges a premium for 30 or 40-year fixed mortgages. In fact, all other things being equal, interest rates get higher when you fix them for a longer period of time. An interest rate that’s fixed for 5 years will be slightly higher than one that’s fixed for only 3 years. A 7-year fixed is higher than a 5-year fixed. A 10-year is higher than a 7. A 15-year is yet higher and a 30-year fixed interest rate has traditionally been the highest. Of course, recently, the lending community has come out with the new 40-year mortgages. When fixed for the full 40 years, the rate is slightly higher than the 30-year. You pay for the luxury of a fixed interest rate; the longer it’s fixed, the higher the rate is.

Remember: “all other things being equal.” That’s what we’re talking about here. Given the exact same credit, income and assets; given the exact same closing cost structure; given the same down payment or equity; the interest rate will be higher as you fix it for a longer period of time. There’s no question that rates could be higher or lower if other things in the file are different. For example, if you’re comparing a 2-year fixed Subprime loan to a 5-year fixed A-paper loan, the 5-year fixed would have a lower rate than the 2-year Subprime but there are big differences between A-paper and Subprime loans.

The 30-year fixed is, historically, the most conservative choice. You pay for that security with a slightly higher interest rate but the risk is extremely low. The new 40-year mortgage is now increasingly common and by amortizing the loan balance over a longer period, it allows for slightly lower payments. Both of these loans have traditionally required “amortizing” payments; that is, they include both principle and interest.

Recently, the option of a 10-year Interest Only period has been introduced. The rate remains fixed for a full 30 years but you only have to pay interest for the first 10. If you think about it, there’s no reason to have a 40-year loan if you also select the Interest Only option. If you’re only paying interest, the amortization period become irrelevant. Either way, you’re only paying interest. The difference would show up after the Interest Only period expires. With a 30-year loan, the remaining amortization period would be squeezed into the last 20 years. With a 40-year loan, you’d still have a full 30 years to pay the principle down.

Now, how many of us actually plan to spend the next 30 or 40 years in the same house? Perhaps some of us are but the majority plan to move into a different place sometime before 2036 (30 years from now). The trick is to balance the fixed period with the length of time you intend to stay in the property. There’s no sense fixing the interest rate for a period of time when you’ll no longer have the mortgage. There’s no sense paying for a luxury you’ll never benefit from.

In today’s marketplace, you can fix an interest rate for 1 month, 6 months, 1 year, 2 years, 3, 5, 7, 10 years, 15, 20, 30 or even 40 years. So take a minute and think about how long you intend to stay in your current property. 5 years? Maybe 7? If that’s the case, you should only fix your interest rate for 5 or 7 years; maybe 10, just to be safe. That way, you’ll get the lowest interest rate possible while still getting the security of a fixed interest rate for the period of time you expect to keep the mortgage.

Most of these loans – the ones that are only fixed for 3, 5, 7 or 10 years – still have a full 30-year term. The payment is still calculated as if it was a 30-year amortizing loan. Again, if you select an Interest Only option, the amortization schedule becomes irrelevant. It doesn’t matter; you’re only paying interest anyway, at least until the fixed period expires. But for an amortizing loan, the payment is based on a 30-year amortization period and is completely fixed during the initial fixed period. After that, the rate changes to an index plus margin and the loan becomes variable. The margin never changes but the index can move up or down depending on trading activity in the bond markets.

In what circumstances should you select an Interest Only mortgage? Many homeowners today are stretching to make their monthly mortgage payments. Home prices have risen much faster than salaries, so it’s a bigger strain on homebuyers than it was years ago. If you select an amortizing mortgage, you’re basically putting yourself into a forced savings program. Any money you put towards your principle increases your equity. You get all that money back when you sell the house because your loan balance will be lower than it would otherwise, leaving you with more equity. An amortizing mortgage is definitely the ‘conservative’ choice.

On the other hand, you can look at an amortization schedule and see how much of the principle you actually pay down during the first 5 years of a 30-year mortgage. Not much. If you’re only planning to stay in the property for 5 years, the difference in your equity is fairly minimal. Meanwhile, paying interest only would reduce your monthly payment. In California, Interest Only mortgages are extremely common and they definitely serve a purpose for those homeowners who are planning to get into a new, perhaps bigger, property within a few years.

The important thing to remember, obviously, is that your original principle balance never gets any smaller. In that sense, you’re basically renting the house and banking on appreciation to build equity. During the past 10 years with house prices rising between 10 and 20% each year, this strategy has paid-off handsomely. But what happens when the market starts going sideways as it is today? What happens if prices remain the same or even go down a bit?

Also, consider the fact that you’ll have to pay 5 or 6% real estate commissions when you sell. If you put 20% down on a house and only pay interest for 5 years and if house prices remain stable, you’ll actually lose money on the deal. You’ll start with 20% equity. If you end up paying 5% real estate commissions, you’ll sell the place with only 15% equity (20%-5%) so you’ll have less money after you sell the place than when you bought it 5 years earlier. And that doesn’t include the closing costs associated with the original purchase. Those generally run about 2% so you’d end up losing 7% of the house’s value during the 5-year period.

If the place actually drops in value, the situation gets even worse. I recently spoke with someone in this situation. He bought a place 10 months ago and can’t keep up with the mortgage payments. His situation is even worse because he’s got a prepayment penalty in his loan. Meanwhile, his home hasn’t appreciated a cent. Between real estate commissions and the penalty, he’ll be out over $35K if he sold today (he originally did 100% financing). If he rents it out, he’ll still be under water about $1500 per month. Either way, he’s in a bad situation. You have to be careful. Profit is not guaranteed.

That brings me to the last major loan program; one that is gaining in popularity. It’s a bit scary, actually, because this last type of mortgage is the least conservative of the bunch. It’s called an Option ARM and it gives the borrower a choice of 4 different payment options each month. They can pay a minimum payment which is based on an artificial starting interest rate of just 1%. They can pay the Interest Only payment. They can pay the 30-year amortized payment or they can pay the 15-year amortized payment – the highest of the 4.

We’ve all heard about these 1% mortgages. They’re heavily promoted and most of the marketing is deceptive. I personally believe that less than 10% of the people who get into these loans truly understand what they’re getting into. There’s no research to support that – it’s only my opinion. Let’s take a closer look and unravel the hype surrounding these loan products. Believe me; they’re not as great as they may appear.

First off, rates have never been 1% and they never will be. 1% is a marketing label that helps sell loans. They calculate the payment assuming a 1% start rate, but this minimum payment is less than the Interest Only payment. You’re under water right from the start. The difference between this minimum payment and the Interest Only payment is referred to as “deferred interest” and it gets added to your mortgage balance each month. It’s called Negative Amortization and it erases your equity every time you make that low minimum payment.

The next thing is that these loan programs are not fixed. They’re variable right from the first month. The minimum payment structure is indeed fixed for the first 7 years (in most cases), but that’s an artificial payment – a Negative Amortization payment. Those minimum payments don’t reflect the true interest rate at all. The underlying interest rate on these loans is variable and can change every month.

Third, the 30-year amortized payment is not fixed either. When people hear “30-year”, they automatically assume “fixed”. That’s not the case here. There’s a big difference between “amortized” and “fixed”. With a variable interest rate, the 30-year amortized payment changes each month. And these days, it’s probably getting higher, not lower.

We have to admit that there is value in these programs for people who fully understand them. In an appreciating real estate market, they can make it easier to maintain an investment property or provide flexibility for someone with an uneven income stream. But if the real estate is not appreciating, these programs erase your equity and destroy potential profits. So be careful.

Patrick Schwerdtfeger

5 comments - What do you think?
Posted by mark - January 22, 2014 at 9:47 am

Categories: Conservative News   Tags:

The Path of Constitutional Law: Continuity Crossroads Crisis

The path of constitutional law has indeed run through the Nation’s most pivotal events and controversies—from the Civil War to the Cold War, from industrialization to the computer age, and from states’ rights to civil rights. How well has the Constitution mediated society’s most basic conflicts? What are the most important issues that remain unsettled in constitutional law? And can our Constitution be readily adapted to the challenges on the horizon? In this presentation from UC Berkeley School of Law, six of the nation’s top legal scholars address these questions and more. [10/2005] [Public Affairs] [Show ID: 11153]

Duration : 0:56:36

Read more…

15 comments - What do you think?
Posted by mark - January 21, 2014 at 9:20 am

Categories: Constitutional Law   Tags:

Next Page »